Community Amenity Contributions Policy Found to be Improper Mandatory Payment Regime
2025-07-23Legal Updates
In June 2025, Mr. Justice Coval found that the Township of Langley’s Community Amenity Contributions (CAC) Policy constituted an improper mandatory amenity payment regime, which meant the CAC Policy was invalid and set aside. The decision is published as Lorval Developments Ltd. v. Langley (Township), 2025 BCSC 1148. Josh KrusellJosh Krusell is the Managing Partner […]
Read Article
2025-07-21Legal Updates
In a recent article, Jacob Gehlen wrote about the decision in Smith v Clearwater, where the BC Supreme Court exercised its discretion under section 35 of the Property Law Act (the “PLA”) to cancel a restrictive covenant prohibiting multi-family development. Recent court decisions have addressed several similar matters, including DBKS Homes Ltd. v Taylor, 2025 BCSC 1202, where the […]
Read Article
Density Prevails: BCSC Cancels a Building Scheme Prohibiting High-Density Construction
2025-07-10Legal Updates
In Smith v. Clearwater Park GP Inc., 2025 BCSC 1239, the BC Supreme Court heard two petitions related to the proposed construction of a four-unit townhouse on a property in Squamish (the “Property”). The Property was subject to a common law building scheme and restrictive covenant in favour of the original developer each restricting construction […]
Read Article
2025-07-09Legal Updates
On June 11, 2025 the BC Court of Appeal reversed the earlier decision of the BC Supreme Court in Ironclad Developments Inc. v. West Kelowna (City), 2024 BCSC 1285 (the “Ironclad BCSC” decision) which we wrote about here. The Court of Appeal found in its decision, cited as 2025 BCCA 191, that there was a […]
Read Article
Supreme Court of Canada Sides with Local Governments on 5G Access in Telus decision
2025-06-25Legal Updates
In Telus Communications Inc. v. Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 2025 SCC 15 (“Telus”) the Supreme Court of Canada considered whether the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has the authority to grant telecommunications carriers access to install modern wireless infrastructure, specifically, 5G small cell antennas, on public lands without local government consent. The court concluded […]
Read Article
Section 7 Charter Rights and Bike Lanes – Ongoing Developments from Ontario
2025-06-10Legal Updates
On April 22, 2025, Justice Schabas of the Ontario Superior Court granted an interim injunction restraining section 195.6 of the Ontario Provincial Government’s recently amended Highway Traffic Act, SRO 1990 c. H.8 (The “HTA”) from being implemented in the decision of Cycle Toronto et al v Attorney General of Ontario et al, 2025 ONSC 2424 […]
Read Article
A Real Stair Case: Permitting Shoreline Stairs Raises Neighbour Dispute
2024-11-19Legal Updates
The recent decision of Armstrong v. District of North Saanich, 2024 BCSC 1844 involved the District of North Saanich finding itself in the middle of a neighbour dispute. It is an important decision in confirming that the courts cannot and will not interfere with local government decisions so long as the local government can demonstrate it […]
Read Article
Notice This! Navigating Tax Sale Notice Requirements
2024-09-26Legal Updates
At 10:00 am on October 7, 2024, municipal tax collectors across British Columbia will conduct the statutorily mandated annual tax sale for 2024. Properties with delinquent property tax accounts, which are those with three years of unpaid property taxes, will be sold to the highest bidder above the “upset price.” The upset price is the […]
Read Article
Is a Guinea Fowl a Fowl: an Offender’s Intention and the Interpretation of Bylaws
2024-09-03Legal Updates
On June 17, 2024, in the judgment of R v Reid, 2024 BCSC 1044, Madam Justice Sharma of the British Columbia Supreme Court released her decision on what, at first blush, appears to be an undeniably odd question under appeal: is a guinea fowl a “fowl” for the purposes of Vancouver’s Animal Control Bylaw 9150 […]
Read Article
All’s Fair in Love and Latecomer Fees (Or not! See our more recent Court of Appeal summary)
2024-07-25Legal Updates
NOTE: THIS DECISION HAS BEEN OVERTURNED ON APPEAL. PLEASE FIND OUR SUMMARY OF THE APPEAL DECISION HERE. In the recent decision Ironclad Developments Inc. v. West Kelowna (City), 2024 BCSC 1285, the Honourable Madam Justice Hardwick held that local governments do not owe procedural fairness rights to property owners when charging them latecomer fees. Mel […]
Read Article