Court of Appeal Rejects Major Industry Tax Challenge
May 30, 2011Legal Updates
As reported in Fall LoGo 2009, Catalyst Paper Corporation appealed to the British Columbia Court of Appeal from the dismissal by the Supreme Court of British Columbia of Catalyst’s four court challenges to the major industry tax rates in the District of North Cowichan, the City of Campbell River, the City of Port Alberni and […]
Read Article
Local Government Successful in First Heritage Designation Compensation Arbitration
May 30, 2011Legal Updates
On February 3, 2010, the arbitrator in Rogers’ Chocolates Ltd. v. City of Victoria, handed down the first arbitration decision awarding compensation under section 969 of the Local Government Act as a result of a heritage designation bylaw. Rogers’ Chocolates Ltd. owns an old building at 913 Government Street in Victoria. It has done so […]
Read Article
May 30, 2011Legal Updates
On March 18, 2010, the British Columbia Supreme Court gave its decision in Fraser Health Authority v Jongerden and upheld the ban on the distribution of raw milk in British Columbia. The court granted the injunction sought by the Fraser Health Authority prohibiting individuals from packaging and/or distributing raw milk and/or raw milk products for […]
Read Article
Service Withdrawal Arbitrations
May 30, 2011Legal Updates
On February 8, 2010 an arbitrator’s decision determined the extent of the jurisdiction of a service withdrawal arbitration under section 813.13 of the Local Government Act in City of Vernon v. Regional District of North Okanagan and District of Coldstream. In this case, the City of Vernon had requested a partial withdrawal from the Greater […]
Read Article
Responding to Due Diligence Letters from a Purchaser’s Lawyer
May 25, 2011Legal Updates
In the Spring 2005 issue of this newsletter, we cautioned against providing “approval in principle” comfort letters to developers seeking to market early under the Real Estate Development and Marketing Act. In the same vein, but of more frequency and concern, are property information/zoning confirmation requests from the lawyers acting for purchasers of property. These […]
Read Article
Reserve Land – Tenures Available to Local Governments
May 25, 2011Legal Updates
Every so often, a local government may require an interest in a First Nation’s reserve lands, be it for highway/road access purposes, or to construct and operate a sewer or water line or outfall. This article identifies the interests that are available to local governments under the Indian Act on reserve lands of a First […]
Read Article
Court of Appeal Confirms Mayor Had No Conflict
May 25, 2011Legal Updates
The Court of Appeal has ruled against the Appellants in the decision of Fairbrass v. Hansma 2010 BCCA 319, upholding the lower court’s decision that the Mayor of the Township of Spallumcheen did not have a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in relation to a proposed amendment of the Township’s Official Community Plan.
Read Article
Pucci v. City of North Vancouver: Be Careful What You Wish For
May 20, 2011Legal Updates
A recent decision resulting in a successful challenge to a City of North Vancouver zoning bylaw, Pucci v. North Vancouver (City) 2010 BCSC 743, highlights a possible ground for challenging decisions, even in the absence of having to provide actual reasons. Pucci involved a challenge to a rezoning bylaw that would have had the effect […]
Read Article
May 20, 2011Legal Updates
On its face, section 49 of the Community Charter provides a powerful tool to municipalities and regional districts to seek humane destruction of vicious dogs in their jurisdictions. However, the Provincial Court of British Columbia has recently indicated that section 49 does not necessarily operate as a reliable tool to keep vicious dogs out of […]
Read Article
Allegation That Municipal Official Authorized Unlawful Use is No Defence to Zoning Bylaw Enforcement
May 11, 2011Legal Updates
The British Columbia Supreme Court recently reconfirmed that local government enforcement of zoning bylaws cannot be curtailed in circumstances where unlawful use might have been authorized by a municipal official and was, at the very least, known to the municipality at the time the unlawful use commenced.
Read Article