You Should be A-Waltzing with TILMA Today
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
The Trade Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement (“TILMA”), an agreement between the governments of British Columbia and Alberta came into effect on April 1, 2009 for the MASH sector (municipalities, academic institutions, schools and hospitals) in British Columbia.
Read Article
No Defamation Remedy for Local Government
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
The law of defamation has recently changed for local government in British Columbia. In 1975, the British Columbia Court of Appeal in the City of Prince George v. British Columbia Television Systems Ltd. held that local government could bring an action for defamation. The Court held that since every incorporated municipality has all the rights […]
Read Article
The Summer of Discontent: The 2009 Major Industry Tax Revolt
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
In the midst of the global recession, which has severely affected the British Columbia economy generally and the economies of resource communities in particular, several communities across British Columbia are facing an unprecedented tax revolt by major industry. In Campbell River, North Cowichan, Port Alberni and Powell River proceedings have been commenced in British Columbia […]
Read Article
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
The Facts of the Case In Heyes v. Vancouver, TransLink, Canada Rapid Line Transit Inc. and Transit B.C. Limited Partnership the defendants, TransLink, Canada Rapid Line Transit Inc. and Transit B.C. Limited Partnership were found liable in nuisance for the damages to the business operated by the plaintiff caused by the massive disruption of switching […]
Read Article
Awarding Costs in Public Interest Cases
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
The issue in Vancouver (City) v. Zhang, 2009 BCSC 614, was whether costs should be awarded against an unsuccessful party alleging a breach of the party’s rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms where that party’s interest coincides with the public interest.
Read Article
The OCP Trump Card: By Appeasing Popular Opinion Council Oversteps its Jurisdiction
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
It is a problem often shared by local governments: letters to the editor start pouring into the local newspaper from citizens concerned about a new condo development. The complaints are commonplace, but usually revolve around the proposed new building somehow not fitting into the community. The trouble is that the condo developer has met the […]
Read Article
Court Rejects Major Industry Tax Challenge
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
As reported in the Summer 2009 issue of Logo Notebook, several major industrial companies launched legal proceedings challenging the extent of local government taxation on major industrial properties. On October 16, 2009, the British Columbia Supreme Court dismissed the challenge brought by Catalyst Paper Corporation against the District of North Cowichan.
Read Article
Derelict and Abandoned Manufactured Homes
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
With building bylaws demanding increasingly strict construction standards, today’s manufactured homes are being built to stand the test of time, much like conventional houses. Unfortunately, neglect and British Columbia’s climatic conditions are turning existing holiday ramblers into ramshackle structures. Since older manufactured homes have tended to decrease in value as they age and fall into […]
Read Article
Collecting Debts as Unpaid Property Taxes – Know Your Limit, Play Within It
June 3, 2011Legal Updates
As many local governments know, the treatment of fees, charges, expenses and other amounts due and owing to a municipality or regional district can, in some circumstances, be treated and collected in the same manner and with the same remedies as property taxes; if the amount owing remains unpaid on December 31st of the year […]
Read Article
Approving Officer Appeals Avoid the Dunsmuir Bullet
May 30, 2011Legal Updates
In 1976 in City of Vancouver v. Simpson, the Supreme Court of Canada settled the law relating to appeals from decisions of subdivision approving officers under section 89 of the Land Title Act. The Court limited the grounds for appealing those decisions to three grounds, namely, was the decision made 1. in bad faith, 2. […]
Read Article